I am very excited to say that I have spent this morning catching up on the 24 hour marathon of College Hoops that took place on ESPN Monday and Tuesday. It's amazing how many of these games were close and exciting to watch. As a coach, I enjoy watching these teams and stealing any good ideas I see out on the court. I am sad to report that I have not seen much that I can use, even from Butler who almost always shows some great sets.
It's apart that we are in the early part of the season, many of these teams sets seem sloppy at best. Monday I watch part of the Pepperdine @ UCLA game and was pretty unimpressed with what UCLA did against Pepperdine's 2-3 zone. Even though they survived with a win, it seems the only success they were having against a under matched opponent was to get the ball into the high post for a turn and face, most of the time I has watching they scored simply because they were more athletic. That may work for the Bruins against a Mid level WCC team, but not sure how well it work work against tougher teams (although the PAC 10 maybe lucky to be as good as the WCC this year, I have low expectations...).
Deep down in my heart, I am a Ducks fan, and I have yet to see a game which saddens me. I think that Dana Altman can turn it around for them after sometime I think this year will be pretty tough one for Oregon. So I have decided that I need to pick out a few more teams to follow this year. So, this year I will be attempting to follow these teams:
Butler
New Mexico
Navy
San Diego St
This should be a bit of a challenge for me, between keeping track of my own teams and, of course, the Ducks. I have succeeded in only watching 2 of these teams so far, but hopefully next time I write will have news on all 5. I watched Butler get rolled by Louisville last night and SD St. survive against Gonzaga.
Butler, in my opinion, was taken out early against Louisville. The 1st 10 min (or in middle school basketball, 1st 6 min, see below for more on this) is so important as to how a game is going to go, the officiating being one of the main factors at this point in a game. If one team is going to play more physical, push through players and grab arms and get away with it, while the other is picking up ticky-tak fouls on the other end, you can find yourself in a hole right away. Matt Howard, who last year was a foul magnet, picked up 2 quick ones in under 4 minutes, one of which was a terrible call. This happen while Louisville was allowed to grab and push the Bulldogs pretty much at will. This took Butler out of rhythm and got to the point where it strongly effected the game. I must add however, that Butler's HC execution was horrible for most of the game. If not for Shelvin Mack, the Bulldogs could have been down 20 early in the 1st half. In the 2nd half the refs found their whistles and a ton of fouls on both sides got called. But the damage had already been done early and Butler didn't have a chance to come back. I think that Butler played poorly, and they missed Hayward in a big way last night, but when your getting physically beaten up and down the court its not a equal playing field. If refs call the 1st 10 min tight (or at least fair) then the game will not have over 40 fouls called. Players adjust to how its being called. And anyone who says that an even foul count suggested good calls needs to stop repeating what they hear on the radio. TEAMS NEVER FOUL EQUALLY IN GAMES. Anyone who watches sports with an ounce of intelligence can tell you that.
I am entering the 3rd week of the middle school basketball season. Last night we had our 2nd game of the season. Both teams won in our last game and I think felt pretty good heading into this one. We played Waitsburg/Prescott who usually has a decent team, last year we lost both our games and I felt like we could compete this year. Our B team survived a squeaker, 20-18, with a young man named Aaron hitting the winning hoop with under a minute to go. Kids played tough defense and it paid off, we didn't take a lot of quality shots and that's why it was so close. In this game, I would have to say that we got one or two calls that when our way, something that we do not usually get. We stole the ball in the back court (B teams are not allowed to press unless last 2 minutes of the half or 4th quarter) and scored, also they didn't call a travel on a hoop we scored. I consider myself someone not blind to what really happens, even when its my team playing.
The A game on the other hand was a different story. We started the game on a 6-0 run for us and it got ugly from there. They had kids what were bigger, stronger and more aggressive. The game was called to strongly favor them and we suffered for being a much less physical team. Basketball stops being basketball when kids are getting slammed to the floor. Now I have to say that we didn't play well on offense, when we made it into the HC, we executed poorly, unable to get to the basket and finish strongly. The final was 36-16, scoring only 16 points in any game and expecting to win in unlikely and I blame myself for that. We didn't break the press well and missed many fast break opportunities because of poor passing. These are all things we need to work on, as well as being tough and able to take a punch to the gut when it is give to us.
I am still very proud of my guys and we will continue to get better. Our season only lasted another month, we will play 7 more games and I know we will use this game as a chance in improve. What I need to learn from this experience is that my teams need to be able to deal with a physical game and continue to be effective, that is what a good team would do in this situation. Always something to work on...
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Where is Gilbert and when do the real games start?
This last week the National Basketball Association started it's regular season. Normally all that means to me is the chance to see some sweet dunks on Sportscenter Top 10. This year however I was talked into playing in a NBA fantasy league. This has forced me to pay attention to at least which individuals are having a good year, even if I don't care about the teams. Sadly, since I stopped being a Boston Celtics fan my senior year in high school (I like Paul Pierce when he was only good player on the team, but his attitude has turned a bit terrible since his team has improved). But this year I have watched at least parts of several games, something that usually only happened if I was eating at Applebee's in the past. Here is my fantasy team as it stands today:
Gilbert Arenas
Andre Iguodala
Jameer Nelson
Danny Granger
Al Horford
Rudy Gay
Andrew Bogut
Emeka Okafor
Ron Artest
Mikael Beasley
Manu Ginobili
Yoa Ming
Sadly I missed the 1st 4 picks of the draft and auto draft picked for me. Thankfully the computer is most likely smarter then I so it worked out fine. My stupid roommate also missed the draft and the computer auto picked him a team much stronger then if he had picked on his own(he did get 1st pick, so naturally he did acquire Kevin Durant, a pick even he would have made on his own). The good news is that he has already stopped caring and has not adjusted his line up yet this week. Gilbert Arenas has yet to make an appearance this season, I really hope his "hurt" ankle gets better before I have to play Spartanpride in my league, I don't need to face any 28 pt John Wall games that week!
As far as fantasy strategy goes, I have to admit my knowledge is limited. But we are doing a head-to-head league in which 9 statistical categories battle against each other for the week. Wouldn't it make sense to pick 5 of these categories and dominate them only? That way you are likely to win almost any match-up and occasionally you may even beat your opponent in another category by chance. Just for the sake of argument, lets say you decided to dominate in the Rebounds, Blocks, TO(turnovers), FG %, Pt's (total points) categories. If you picked a team of mostly big man (you can have 2 centers and 2 utility players which can be any position) and guards/forwards who were known as good rebounds, odds are that would also make your team have a high FG % (big men shoot closer to the hoop right?). Having more bigs may also decrease number of TO's as well. Big also more likely to pick up blocks. That is 4 down, now Pt's I could see as a wild card as games you may have big men who don't score a huge amount every game. And scoring guards sometimes turn the ball over a little more.
Pretty much just writing that down as I think of it, are there strategy's similar to this? If you know of some write in and let me know (assuming someone is reading this).
In the Lakers vs Suns game last week of which I saw some highlights from, I couldn't help but notice a pretty sweet play they setup. Kobe had setup in the the post on the right side. Fisher had the ball up top and dribble to the left side of the court, Gasol setup at the top the the FT line directly in the middle. Kobe jogged up to the top as though he would be getting the ball to run what I am they run often, the pick-n-roll with Kobe and Gasol. But When Kobe got to Gasol's level, Gasol quickly stepped up and set a screen for Kobe. Jason Richardson was guarding Kobe and saw the screen very late (looked like was keeping on eye on Fisher). Kobe made a speed change coming around the screen, even though Richardson went under the screen it was too late and Fisher passed the ball to Kobe for an easy 2 pts. It's nice to see NBA teams using an old piece of basketball. To me this looked very much like a high UCLA screen. Something like that would normally be easy for an NBA team to handle but by changing up how they got into the screen it was difficult to read it was coming.
In much more exciting news, college basketball is less than a week away! Nov. 8 games will begin for Division 1 (at least 1st games that I could find, if I am wrong please tell me). The 1st night will include:
RI vs Pitt should be a fun game as the Rams are usually an uptempo team and Pitt always has great defense. Next time I write I hope to be talking about the 1st week of NCAA games I have watched! Until then, you can entertain yourself with some highlights of NBA games, those fellas can jump pretty high!
Gilbert Arenas
Andre Iguodala
Jameer Nelson
Danny Granger
Al Horford
Rudy Gay
Andrew Bogut
Emeka Okafor
Ron Artest
Mikael Beasley
Manu Ginobili
Yoa Ming
Sadly I missed the 1st 4 picks of the draft and auto draft picked for me. Thankfully the computer is most likely smarter then I so it worked out fine. My stupid roommate also missed the draft and the computer auto picked him a team much stronger then if he had picked on his own(he did get 1st pick, so naturally he did acquire Kevin Durant, a pick even he would have made on his own). The good news is that he has already stopped caring and has not adjusted his line up yet this week. Gilbert Arenas has yet to make an appearance this season, I really hope his "hurt" ankle gets better before I have to play Spartanpride in my league, I don't need to face any 28 pt John Wall games that week!
As far as fantasy strategy goes, I have to admit my knowledge is limited. But we are doing a head-to-head league in which 9 statistical categories battle against each other for the week. Wouldn't it make sense to pick 5 of these categories and dominate them only? That way you are likely to win almost any match-up and occasionally you may even beat your opponent in another category by chance. Just for the sake of argument, lets say you decided to dominate in the Rebounds, Blocks, TO(turnovers), FG %, Pt's (total points) categories. If you picked a team of mostly big man (you can have 2 centers and 2 utility players which can be any position) and guards/forwards who were known as good rebounds, odds are that would also make your team have a high FG % (big men shoot closer to the hoop right?). Having more bigs may also decrease number of TO's as well. Big also more likely to pick up blocks. That is 4 down, now Pt's I could see as a wild card as games you may have big men who don't score a huge amount every game. And scoring guards sometimes turn the ball over a little more.
Pretty much just writing that down as I think of it, are there strategy's similar to this? If you know of some write in and let me know (assuming someone is reading this).
In the Lakers vs Suns game last week of which I saw some highlights from, I couldn't help but notice a pretty sweet play they setup. Kobe had setup in the the post on the right side. Fisher had the ball up top and dribble to the left side of the court, Gasol setup at the top the the FT line directly in the middle. Kobe jogged up to the top as though he would be getting the ball to run what I am they run often, the pick-n-roll with Kobe and Gasol. But When Kobe got to Gasol's level, Gasol quickly stepped up and set a screen for Kobe. Jason Richardson was guarding Kobe and saw the screen very late (looked like was keeping on eye on Fisher). Kobe made a speed change coming around the screen, even though Richardson went under the screen it was too late and Fisher passed the ball to Kobe for an easy 2 pts. It's nice to see NBA teams using an old piece of basketball. To me this looked very much like a high UCLA screen. Something like that would normally be easy for an NBA team to handle but by changing up how they got into the screen it was difficult to read it was coming.
Rhode Island at (4) Pittsburgh 4pm
UC Irvine at (16) Illinois 5pm
Navy at (25) Texas 6pm
Seattle at Maryland 5pm
WARNING: All times are west coast time!Seattle at Maryland 5pm
RI vs Pitt should be a fun game as the Rams are usually an uptempo team and Pitt always has great defense. Next time I write I hope to be talking about the 1st week of NCAA games I have watched! Until then, you can entertain yourself with some highlights of NBA games, those fellas can jump pretty high!
Sunday, October 24, 2010
THE END OF THE WORLD AND COLLEGE HOOPS
This last Saturday while sitting in church, I was thumbing through the bulletin when I came across an interesting hand out. It was a group who is attempting to translate the Bible into every known language, and probably some unknown languages as well. In this handout, it stated that around 350 million people still did not have the Bible in their own language. This number seemed rather large at first, but as I began to digest this information, it struck me that this is a rather small number compared to the 6 billion that currently are estimated to live on the earth. In fact that's around 5.83% of the world population that do not have the Bible in their language. So here is my question, what happens when all those people get the Bible in their language! Will all people on all the earth be considered to have heard the word? Will this be the end? Can this happen by December 31, 2012? I guess we will have to wait a few years and see how this all pans out.
In hoops news, NCAA basketball is just around the corner and I cannot wait! I think this will be a really good year outside of the disappointing injury to Robbie Hummel, who I thought would have an outstanding season and pro career but now faces a very tough season of rehab. I have been reading through the conference previews on ESPN and couldn't help but notice a short clip in which Seth Greenberg, the coach at Virgina Tech, was still crying about last years no bid to the tourney. This made me sad as I like Greenberg (he has a great DVD out on defensive stance) and think he is a pretty decent coach. But geez guy, give it a rest.
He still feels as though the numbers are not high enough to the NCAA National Championship tourney. He went on to say that while 68 is better and 96 is too high there should be a number in the middle to make everyone happy. I guess my request to Virgina Tech would be to actually play someone i the pre-season so that those 26 wins have some substance behind them or get somewhere in your conference tourney like everyone else has to do. I am guessing that games against Kansas St, Purdue and Mississippi St will help them a little. They are also playing Campbell University in there season opener, which has my 2nd favorite college mascot behind the Youngstown St Penguins. Go Fighting Camels!!!
I did a small amount of research into the percentage of teams that typically make it to the post season in the "Big" sporting events (NBA, MLB, NFL, and College Football). This is what I came up with, the MLB has 8 of its 30 teams into post season (26/7%), NFL 12 of 32 (37.5%), NBA 16 of 30 (53.3%), NCAA Football 70 of 119 (58.5%), and NCAA D1 basketball 68/437 (19.5%). I have to admit I has a little surprised by this, even D2 is slightly better with 64 of 281 teams (22/7%). But not nearly as rough as D3, which only takes 61 out of a whopping 449 teams (13.5%)! Although not totally sure those all have basketball programs. D1 basketball is on the lower spectrum of teams that get the post season from the extremes of D3 and the laughable NBA and College Football (to be bowl eligible in football all you have to do is be at .500 record, almost as sad the the NBA which has sub .500 teams in the playoffs).
So what does this say about the tourney? Do we need to increase the numbers? Should we be fighting about a middle of the pack Big Ten or a number 2 team in the Patriot league deserving to get a bid (think Northwestern and Bucknell least year)? We will have to see how the "last 4 out" goes this year and just hope that Greenberg can win a few games so that he can get a bid and stop crying. Watering down a product that makes a huge amount of money for the NCAA seems pretty dumb right now, but I guess they have a wide variety of people to please but you want to keep your product healthy and profitable you better be careful.
PLAY OF THE WEEK
This is what I came up with this past week, let me know what you think, named after Purdue because of some stolen concepts from notes I was looking at
Plee of the Week:
Can someone please buy me a copy of Walberg's Half-Court DVD? Also maybe some play creator software....
In hoops news, NCAA basketball is just around the corner and I cannot wait! I think this will be a really good year outside of the disappointing injury to Robbie Hummel, who I thought would have an outstanding season and pro career but now faces a very tough season of rehab. I have been reading through the conference previews on ESPN and couldn't help but notice a short clip in which Seth Greenberg, the coach at Virgina Tech, was still crying about last years no bid to the tourney. This made me sad as I like Greenberg (he has a great DVD out on defensive stance) and think he is a pretty decent coach. But geez guy, give it a rest.
He still feels as though the numbers are not high enough to the NCAA National Championship tourney. He went on to say that while 68 is better and 96 is too high there should be a number in the middle to make everyone happy. I guess my request to Virgina Tech would be to actually play someone i the pre-season so that those 26 wins have some substance behind them or get somewhere in your conference tourney like everyone else has to do. I am guessing that games against Kansas St, Purdue and Mississippi St will help them a little. They are also playing Campbell University in there season opener, which has my 2nd favorite college mascot behind the Youngstown St Penguins. Go Fighting Camels!!!
I did a small amount of research into the percentage of teams that typically make it to the post season in the "Big" sporting events (NBA, MLB, NFL, and College Football). This is what I came up with, the MLB has 8 of its 30 teams into post season (26/7%), NFL 12 of 32 (37.5%), NBA 16 of 30 (53.3%), NCAA Football 70 of 119 (58.5%), and NCAA D1 basketball 68/437 (19.5%). I have to admit I has a little surprised by this, even D2 is slightly better with 64 of 281 teams (22/7%). But not nearly as rough as D3, which only takes 61 out of a whopping 449 teams (13.5%)! Although not totally sure those all have basketball programs. D1 basketball is on the lower spectrum of teams that get the post season from the extremes of D3 and the laughable NBA and College Football (to be bowl eligible in football all you have to do is be at .500 record, almost as sad the the NBA which has sub .500 teams in the playoffs).
So what does this say about the tourney? Do we need to increase the numbers? Should we be fighting about a middle of the pack Big Ten or a number 2 team in the Patriot league deserving to get a bid (think Northwestern and Bucknell least year)? We will have to see how the "last 4 out" goes this year and just hope that Greenberg can win a few games so that he can get a bid and stop crying. Watering down a product that makes a huge amount of money for the NCAA seems pretty dumb right now, but I guess they have a wide variety of people to please but you want to keep your product healthy and profitable you better be careful.
PLAY OF THE WEEK
This is what I came up with this past week, let me know what you think, named after Purdue because of some stolen concepts from notes I was looking at
Plee of the Week:
Can someone please buy me a copy of Walberg's Half-Court DVD? Also maybe some play creator software....
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
IT'S ALL HAPPENING AGAIN
For the past few weeks (in reality the last few months) I have been gearing up to start the basketball season. I am coaching at Rogers Adventist School, as the 7th-8th head coach and Walla Walla Valley Academy, as a JV head coach and varsity assistant. I have been writing up practices plans, drawing up inbounds plays, and re-evaluating our defense. And now, its about to take me over for another 5 months and if you include being a big time college fan make it 6 months. Even though I dream about it at home, breaks at work and while spending time with friends, it always seems to sneak up on me. Not that I wouldn't say I am unprepared, it just seems unreal that we are about to start another season.
If I am forced to, I can think back through the web of time and remember my 1st season as a coach. I has the freshman coach at WWVA in 2005-2006. I think about the nervous phone call I made to Coach Schafer to ask about coaching there. He graciously allowed me to coach for him at the entry level Freshman job. We practice with the JV team at Rogers gym and it was a fiasco. Too many kids and to say that the coaching staff was inexperienced would be like saying Jordan might have a chance of beating Betty White in a game of 1 on 1. I learned a lot that year and had great kids even though we didn't experience much success, a nice way of saying we had a totally defeated season, they taught me how little I knew about coaching and the preparation it takes to have a successful team (and that means way more then just how many wins you get).
This year I feel a lot different heading into the season although I still feel that same sense of unpredictability I felt that season. Which guys will stand out in the crowd? What inbounds play will be a total flop? Will we meet our goals by the end of the season? I really do have answers to these questions, but that's OK. I love this time of year, it's the previews to the movies, it's the last few moments right before you get to Disneyland. The not knowing maybe the best part of the season, but that's about over now and on Monday at 3:00pm we start the knowing and I can't wait.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
